Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 17:12:24 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] proposed PnP layer changes/fixes and cleanups"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "[PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 04:45:50PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> The o(1) scheduler is an interesting beast. It handles most workloads

O(1) is very, very different from o(1). Don't skip that shift key!

Also see:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AsymptoticNotation.html

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] proposed PnP layer changes/fixes and cleanups"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "[PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Next in thread: David Schwartz: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:17 EST