jw schultz wrote:
> I'm a bit suprised noone else has mentioned this so i will.
> Your RAID description seems to indicate it is built of four
> drives on a two channel HBA. In other words you have two
> pairs of drives each pair sharing a cable (master/slave).
> It is my understanding that that is at best a recepe for
> poor performance. From what i have heard ata66 and above is
> problematic (out of spec) in that configuration. I imagine
> such a configuration might also cause poor interactions
> between the drives.
I've tried another setup with One Disk Per Channel(tm), I'm at 37.1% of
the parity sync now with amazing speeds of 40K/sec and 20314.20 minutes
left.
The new setup is:
>
> Aside from the reputed problems with PDC and with the IBM
> "deathstar" drives you might first try adding another HBA
> and use better cables before you scrap the drives.
What reputed problems? I've heard of problems with IBM disks (like dying
after just one year of use and so on) But I've never heard of any PDC
problems (BTW I have never heard of any success stories either 8) )...
Can you recommend another controller, what's about the HPT, is that one
usable?
Thanks for your time, Mikael
-- Mikael Olenfalk <mikael@netgineers.se> Netgineers- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:11 EST