Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Dec 24 2002 - 21:06:45 EST

Next message: jw schultz: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
Previous message: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: Debugging "cpu freezes""
In reply to: Marc-Christian Petersen: "get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Next in thread: Hubert Mantel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Reply: Hubert Mantel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:

> is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet?

My guess is that the author never submitted it for inclusion.

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: jw schultz: "Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)"
Previous message: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: Debugging "cpu freezes""
In reply to: Marc-Christian Petersen: "get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Next in thread: Hubert Mantel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Reply: Hubert Mantel: "Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 22:00:07 EST