Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas

• Next message: Jeff Nguyen: "Re: nforce2 and agpgart"
• Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:16:32PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

> You have to provide an explicit initializer for DEFINE_PER_CPU
> declarations or you break some platforms with older GCC's which
> otherwise won't put it into the proper section.

I wonder if "some platforms with older GCC's" will ever have these
issues resolved...

  --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jeff Nguyen: "Re: nforce2 and agpgart"
• Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] Convert sockets_in_use to use per_cpu areas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST