Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit

From: Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Date: Sun Dec 22 2002 - 20:48:34 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:48, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1
>
>Con, curiously, what is this OSDL hardware like?
>
>One thing I always liked about your Contest runs were you did them on
>your home machine, which was presumably fairly run-of-the-mill so we
>could keep an eye on the low-end desktop machines.

Forgot to mention I've been doing the scheduler tunables in smp mode just so
it wouldnt take me too long to get results. I have no doubt the signal to
noise ratio is greater in the uniprocessor results though.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+BmtyF6dfvkL3i1gRAq6wAJ9M1DlPK8JL5RaEbaOOcA6z+KhmZwCcDn+W
MUDPF6uqNGyQ8FRtWyr07B4=
=6oDv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST