Correct. Please look at Table B-1. Most of MSRs are shared, but some MSRs are unique in each logical processor, to provide the x86 architectural state. Those SYSENTER MSRs, and Machine Check register save state (IA32_MCG_XXX), for example, are unique.
Jun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Pettersson [mailto:mikpe@csd.uu.se]
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 4:34 AM
> To: mingo@elte.hu; torvalds@transmeta.com
> Cc: drepper@redhat.com; Nakajima, Jun; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
>
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:23:08 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >while reviewing the sysenter trampoline code i started wondering about
> the
> >HT case. Dont HT boxes share the MSRs between logical CPUs? This pretty
> >much breaks the concept of per-logical-CPU sysenter trampolines. It also
> >makes context-switch time sysenter MSR writing impossible, so i really
> >hope this is not the case.
>
> Some MSRs are shared, some aren't. One must always check this in
> the IA32 Volume 3 manual. The three SYSENTER MSRs are not shared.
>
> However, no-one has yet proven that writing to these in the context
> switch path has acceptable performance -- remember, there is _no_
> a priori reason to assume _anything_ about performance on P4s,
> you really do need to measure things before taking design decisions.
>
> Manfred had a version with fixed MSR values and the varying data
> in memory. Maybe that's actually faster.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:30 EST