Re: Valgrind meets UML

From: Jeff Dike (jdike@karaya.com)
Date: Sat Dec 21 2002 - 11:05:25 EST


jeremy@goop.org said:
> The main problem will be that newly allocated memory will still be
> considered initialized by its previous owner. Also, if UML allocates
> memory using mmap, all memory will be considered to be initialized.

What I was doing was having kfree and free_pages set the freed object to
noaccess. Presumably, that tells valgrind to consider the memory
uninitialized.

Presumably, that will also cause errors from inside the allocator if it
touches that memory at all before it's allocated again.

                                Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST