Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 15:31:52 EST


george anzinger wrote:
>
> ...
> > The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable(). Does
> > this look workable?
>
> I am not sure. The first question is when does the online
> bit get set for cpu 0.

Too late, probably. We might need an escape clause for the boot
CPU there.

> The next is that it does inhibit a
> rather large block of printks. Is this ok?

They get buffered, so the info will come out eventually. But we do want
it to come out in a timely manner.
 
> Mind you, I have not tried it yet...

I think it's the right approach. I can take poke at it if you like.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST