Pawel Kot wrote:
>Is it the following chunk? (I can't find anything more appropriate)
>@@ -1378,7 +1378,8 @@
> return;
>
> case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
>- init_amd(c);
>+ if(init_amd(c))
>+ return;
> return;
>
> case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
>What does it fix?
>
>pkot
>
>
i assume there was more to the patch?
i mean first it did init_amd(c) and then return
now it does init_amd(c) and returns in the if or right on the next line,
so that's the same with extra bloat.
confused,
Robert Boermans.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST