Re: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 18:15:51 EST


Hi!

> > But... Metolious sounds *needed*; how do you access voltage sensors
> > without metolious, in a way that can coexist with ACPI thermal
> > support?
>
> (I think you mean thermal sensors)

No, I mean voltage sensors. They are on same smbus as thermal sensors,
yet their are not normally accessible using ACPI. I can talk to smbus
controller directly, but acpi may decide to read temperature while I'm
reading voltage, leading to armagedon.

How is that solved?

> A solution in search of a problem. I can say this because I helped define
> it. :)

Well, I thought that "simple" specs looks reasonable, I did not look
at "advanced" metolious. But it seemed sane (*).

> The machines that care about manageability (servers) appear to be entirely
> disjoint from the ones that have thermal zones (and, servers use IPMI),
> therefore thermal chip contention doesn't happen. And, Metolious required a
> fair amount of AML code.

I have seen desktop machine that can control CPU fan (altrough it is
slow/fast not on/off) and has thermal zone. It would be nice to be
able to check voltages in a safe way...
                                                        Pavel

(*) comapred to ACPI2.0 ;-).

-- 
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST