> 2.-I also have this part enclosed in the if(resp->status ==
> NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) as follows:
> if(resp->status == NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) {
> blah blah...
> wait_on_grace:
> if ((proc == NLMPROC_LOCK) &&
> !argp->block)
> return -EAGAIN
> } else {
> ....
> }
> This with the intention to be very specific as to when we want
> the return -EAGAIN to be called.
The above means that you will still block on a F_GETLK query...
In any case, why would we want to return -EAGAIN in one case where
argp->block isn't set, and not in another? If there are cases where we
want to block and where we are not currently setting argp->block (the
only one I can think of might be NLMPROC_UNLOCK), then we should fix
the caller.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST