Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 04:34:25 EST

Next message: Margit Schubert-While: "Linux 2.5.47-ac2"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Remove BUG in cpu_up"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211122246540.24523-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>
you write:
> Also, it would make sense in the future if smp_cpus_done actually gets a
> value denoting how many cpus are online.

No. Drop the prink by all means, but smp_cpus_done() can call
num_online_cpus() itself. It can't know how many cpus the user
specified, however.

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Margit Schubert-While: "Linux 2.5.47-ac2"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Remove BUG in cpu_up"
In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_init 'CPUS done' looks strange"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST