Re: [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 16:51:47 EST


   From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
   Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:43:40 +0000 (GMT)
   
   Sorry, I still don't get it. If the flush_cache_page is doing something
   necessary, then won't a user access in between it and invalidating pte
   undo what was necessary? And if it's not necessary, why do we do it?
   (For better performance would be a very good reason.)
   
If there are other writable mappings of the page, we can't swap
it out legally.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST