Re: Voyager subarchitecture for 2.5.46

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 14:31:45 EST


On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> I believe you need to *store* last value given to userland.

But that's trivially done: it doesn't even have to be thread-specific, so
it can be just a global entry anywhere in the process data structures.

This is just a random sanity check thing, after all. It doesn't have to be
system-global or even per-cpu. The only really important thing is that
"gettimeofday()" should return monotonically increasing data - and if it
doesn't, the vsyscall would have to ask why (sometimes it's fine, if
somebody did a settimeofday, but usually it's a sign of trouble).

But yes, it's certainly a lot more complex than just doing it in a
controlled system call environment. Which is why I think vsyscalls are
eventually not worth it.

                        Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST