Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy

From: john slee (indigoid@higherplane.net)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 19:48:47 EST

Next message: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Copperm ines"
Previous message: Tom Vier: "2.4.20-rc1 oops"
In reply to: Shlomi Fish: "An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Next in thread: Bruce Ferrell: "Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Reply: Bruce Ferrell: "Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:18:24PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> As part of the "Better SCM" site (that is still under construction), I
> wrote a few essays about BitKeeper:

please do not spam the list with this crap

-- 
toyota power: http://indigoid.net/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky: "RE: [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Copperm ines"
Previous message: Tom Vier: "2.4.20-rc1 oops"
In reply to: Shlomi Fish: "An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Next in thread: Bruce Ferrell: "Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Reply: Bruce Ferrell: "Re: An Analysis of BitKeeper and BitMover's Strategy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST