Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest

From: Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Date: Fri Nov 08 2002 - 22:26:52 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>Con Kolivas wrote:
>> io_load:
>> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>> 2.4.18 [3] 474.1 15 36 10 6.64
>> 2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 6.90
>> 2.4.19-ck9 [2] 140.6 49 5 5 1.97
>> 2.4.20-rc1 [2] 1142.2 6 90 10 16.00
>> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1] 1132.5 6 90 10 15.86
>
>2.4.20-pre3 included some elevator changes. I assume they are the
>cause of this. Those changes have propagated into Alan's and Andrea's
>kernels. Hence they have significantly impacted the responsiveness
>of all mainstream 2.4 kernels under heavy writes.
>
>(The -ck patch includes rmap14b which includes the read-latency2 thing)

Thanks for the explanation. I should have said this was ck with compressed
caching; not rmap.

Con.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9zIB8F6dfvkL3i1gRAs6lAJ0f7E9HTlNl5cOaDnmSfw9gi0QLQgCfV3jh
kaG/a1TzlUviOGz5Ci895uA=
=TyH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST