Re: /prod/PID-related proc fs question

From: Frank v Waveren (fvw@var.cx)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 18:00:20 EST

Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
Previous message: Justin Pryzby: "SiS framebuffer compile fail"
In reply to: Calin A. Culianu: "Re: /prod/PID-related proc fs question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

How about just modifiying argv? or forking? or using diskspace/statfs?
Basicly, you can't stop covert communication between processes unless
you use a _very_ heavily patched kernel, and this was never a design
goal.

-- 
Frank v Waveren                                      Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3
fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|dse.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100     1FF3 47FF 545C CB53
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/fvw@var.cx            7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
Previous message: Justin Pryzby: "SiS framebuffer compile fail"
In reply to: Calin A. Culianu: "Re: /prod/PID-related proc fs question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:50 EST