Re: !(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)

From: Urban Widmark (urban@teststation.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 17:28:33 EST

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
Previous message: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "!(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: !(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Reply: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: !(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> hi all
>
> When will smbfs support O_LARGEFILE?
> I mean - smbfs tells me this, mounted from a win2k server

It's in 2.5. You just need to tell smbmount about it, see:

/Urban

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
Previous message: Daniel Jacobowitz: "Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "!(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: !(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Reply: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: !(smbfs && O_LARGEFILE)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:50 EST