Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 10:18:08 EST

Next message: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: Strange panic as soon as timer interrupts are enabled (recent 2.5)"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: 2.5.45 odd deref in serial_in"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Reply: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
   Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:12:19 +0100

   By the way, is tunnel mode there yet?

   Does it require more than setkey? Or does it need pseudo devices, GRE or
   anything? Just setting up tunnel mode doesn't appear to work - nothing gets
   crypted or signed.

Alexey, any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: Strange panic as soon as timer interrupts are enabled (recent 2.5)"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: 2.5.45 odd deref in serial_in"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Reply: bert hubert: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:48 EST