Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 08:06:02 EST

Next message: James Morris: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] [kbuild] Possibility to sanely link against off-directory .so"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> The bigger picture really should be
> ACPI etc "I want to suspend to disk"

Er, what?

The 'I want to suspend to disk' instruction comes from the generic PM code
too, surely? ACPI just registers a handful of methods with the generic PM
code for actually doing stuff like entering sleep states, etc.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Morris: "Re: IPSEC FIRST LIGHT! (by non-kernel developer :-))"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] [kbuild] Possibility to sanely link against off-directory .so"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:48 EST