[Peter Samuelson]
> > Basically, what I'm saying is, I see no need for the existing .so in
> > the kernel build, much less another one. Static libraries are ever so
> > much easier to manage.
[Roman Zippel]
> If you want to limit people to the config tools in the kernel, there
> is indeed no need for a shared library. Note that during the next
> development cycle all graphical front ends are possibly removed.
Huh? I don't get it. How is a shared library any better than a static
library in this regard? I'm pondering the traditional advantages of
shared libraries, and I cannot think of a single one that matters here.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:48 EST