Hi,
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Petr Baudis wrote:
> With this mode, when you enter a category, no new menu is open, but the
> category is unrolled to the current menu, thus the whole configuration is
> forming one single tree. Some users prefer this as a form of configuration, as
> they consider it easier to take in than the classical behaviour.
It looks mostly ok.
> diff -ru linux/scripts/kconfig/expr.h linux+pasky/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> --- linux/scripts/kconfig/expr.h Sun Nov 3 15:24:01 2002
> +++ linux+pasky/scripts/kconfig/expr.h Sun Nov 3 15:00:17 2002
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
> //char *help;
> struct file *file;
> int lineno;
> + int expanded; /* solely for frontend use */
> //void *data;
> };
The menu structure is mostly readonly, if front ends need to store
something there, I'd rather reactivate the data field (which was meant for
this, but it's currently not used).
> @@ -682,6 +699,9 @@
> int main(int ac, char **av)
> {
> int stat;
> +
> + single_menu_mode = !!getenv("SINGLE_MENU");
> +
> conf_parse(av[1]);
> conf_read(NULL);
>
Could you give it a different name (MENUCONFIG_MODE?) and check it
contents instead of just testing for existence?
> diff -ru linux/scripts/lxdialog/util.c linux+pasky/scripts/lxdialog/util.c
> --- linux/scripts/lxdialog/util.c Sun Nov 3 15:24:21 2002
> +++ linux+pasky/scripts/lxdialog/util.c Sun Nov 3 15:11:44 2002
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
> c = tolower(string[i]);
>
> if (strchr("<[(", c)) ++in_paren;
> - if (strchr(">])", c)) --in_paren;
> + if (strchr(">])", c) && in_paren > 0) --in_paren;
>
> if ((! in_paren) && isalpha(c) &&
> strchr(exempt, c) == 0)
What's this needed for?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:43 EST