Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 18:53:01 EST

Next message: David Schwartz: "Re: Entropy from disks"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
In reply to: Mike Diehl: "Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mike Diehl wrote:

> Well, I'm a bit disapointed. My experience with LVM has been nothing
> short of disasterous; EVMS looked like a very good alternative to LVM.

> The biggest thing that EVMS had going for it was it's modular design.

So what's your point ? Device mapper will be an EVMS module, from
the user's point of view.

regards,

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Schwartz: "Re: Entropy from disks"
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
In reply to: Mike Diehl: "Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:40 EST