Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> this incremental patch (over your O(1) CPU time patch) makes
> nice levels work again, though they are fairly steep now:
>
> This might be a decent basis for an O(1) per-user fair
> scheduler, after some more balancing and cleaning up of
> excess code.
Hi Rik,
Your changes look reasonable. I will give them a try.
I'm hoping to get back to playing with scheduler fairness
patchs soon. I made the mistake of starting a re-write of
Posix timers so it may be a few more days.
If anyone else is trying to follow this my patch is
archive here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103508412423719&w=2
Jim Houston - Concurrent Computer Corp.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:39 EST