Re: CONFIG_TINY

• Next message: Timothy Hockin: "[BK SUMMARY] remove NGROUPS hard limit (resend)"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: Driver Maintainers"
• In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Reply: Rob Landley: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:13:48AM +0000, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > > I've used -Os. I've compiled dozens and dozens of packages with -Os. It has
> > > always saved at least a few bytes, I have yet to see it make something
> > > larger. And in the benchmarks I've done, the smaller code actually runs
> > > slightly faster. More of it fits in cache, you know.
> >
> > Then we don't we always use -Os?
>
[snip 6 good reasons]

So why do we want to force it on for CONFIG_TINY?

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Timothy Hockin: "[BK SUMMARY] remove NGROUPS hard limit (resend)"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: Driver Maintainers"
• In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Reply: Rob Landley: "Re: CONFIG_TINY"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:39 EST