Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite

From: Christopher Yeoh (cyeoh@samba.org)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 22:18:30 EST

Next message: Clayton Weaver: "Re: LKCD ("It's the disk, pinheads.")"
Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH] Module loader against 2.5.46: 8/9"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite"
Next in thread: Christopher Yeoh: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 2002/11/4 16:24-0800 Dan Kegel writes:
>
> Anyone know what the relationship between the LTP and LSB Posix
> compliance tests are?

The emphasis on what the test suites are trying to achieve does differ
- eg the LSB doesn't have endurance type tests and concentrates more
on writing tests which can be used for certification purposes. And of
course the LSB test suites only cover the areas that the LSB spec
requires.

> Were they both originally derived from the OpenGroup Posix compliance tests?

I don't think the LTP were tests derived from the OpenGroup (though
I'm not that familiar with them).

Chris

-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Clayton Weaver: "Re: LKCD ("It's the disk, pinheads.")"
Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH] Module loader against 2.5.46: 8/9"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite"
Next in thread: Christopher Yeoh: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:36 EST