Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)

From: Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 10:51:51 EST

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 3 November 2002 10:27, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 16:31, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > I've got well-known
> >
> > drivers/built-in.o(.data+0xa6b4): undefined reference to
> > `local symbols in discarded section .exit.text'
>
> Almost certainly the tulip driver

Yes.

Finding objects, 862 objects, ignoring 42 module(s)
Finding conglomerates, ignoring 74 conglomerate(s)
Scanning objects
Error: ./drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.o .data refers to 00000074 R_386_32 .exit.text
Done

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: Nikita Danilov: "Re: [BK][PATCH] Reiser4, will double Linux FS performance, pleaseapply"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:32 EST