Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up

From: James Morris (jmorris@intercode.com.au)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 08:22:39 EST

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: bert hubert: "Re: [patch] total-epoll r2 ..."
In reply to: $B5HF#1QL@(: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up"
Next in thread: Andras Kis-Szabo: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote:

> So, the reason why the copy of route6_me_harder()
> lives there is because net/ipv6/ip6_output.c has not been
> exported it.
>

Yes. It would be much better to use common core networking code.

- James

-- James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: bert hubert: "Re: [patch] total-epoll r2 ..."
In reply to: $B5HF#1QL@(: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up"
Next in thread: Andras Kis-Szabo: "Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Functions Clean-up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST