Re: [PATCH] performance counters 3.1 for 2.5.45 [1/4]: x86 support

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 22:51:27 EST

Next message: George Staikos: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
In reply to: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] performance counters 3.1 for 2.5.45 [1/4]: x86 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[snipped linus]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:22:01AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> Any chance that this and oprofile could share a common base? We are
> interested in both oprofile and straight performance counting on
> ppc64 and Id prefer not to implement the arch bits twice.

Yes, it would be nice to do this. But I'm not sure what form this should
take (yet)

regards
john

-- 
"My first thought was I don't have any makeup. How will I survive
without my makeup ? My second thought was I didn't have any identification.
Who am I ?"
	- Earthquake victim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George Staikos: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
In reply to: Anton Blanchard: "Re: [PATCH] performance counters 3.1 for 2.5.45 [1/4]: x86 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST