Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)

From: Jon Portnoy (portnoy@tellink.net)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 12:00:50 EST


On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:

> * Nero (neroz@iinet.net.au) wrote:
> > Romain Lievin wrote:
> >
[snip]
> >
> > Yes please :)
> > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any
> > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen.
>
> Oh please....
> Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
> qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
> the library?
>
> Dave

Why? I have a couple boxes that have GTK and don't have QT. A GTK-based
configuration system would be most useful.

Diversity and choice are good things.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST