Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
>
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 02:32:32 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> mentioned:
>
> > Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
> > >
> > But you've inlined them again. Your patches increase my kernel
> > size by 17 kbytes, which is larger than my entire Layer 1 instruction
> > cache!
>
> It is because I was working on this patch based on 2.5.44 :)
>
> As Andi mentioned, how about selecting if OCNFIG_SAMLL is defined?
Well you could make it dependent on CONFIG_SLOW_KERNEL ;)
It's an act of faith - we have no benchmarks on this. But it
goes like this:
- subroutine calls are fast
- cache misses are slow
- kernel has no right to be evicting user code from the CPU cache
- smaller is faster
- inlining to the point of increasing code size is probably wrong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST