On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:50:45AM -0500, Gerald Britton wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:25:01PM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The question I have is whether such external hardware is even worth it
> > any more for any standard crypto work. With a regular PCI bus
> > fundamentally limiting throughput to something like a maximum of 66MB/s
> > (copy-in and copy-out, and that's so theoretical that it's not even
> > funny - I'd be surprised if RL throughput copying back and forth over a
> > PCI bus is more than 25-30MB/s), I suspect that you can do most crypto
> > faster on the CPU directly these days.
>
> This may be true of a typical workstation or large server, but your router
> may not have such a modern CPU in it. Crypto accelerators are likely a
> much bigger win on embedded routers or other small appliances with CPUs such
> as the AMD Elan or other 486 to Pentium class processors.
Yes, and as a tangent, the same class of embedded devices also benefit
from TCP/IP offload facilities. The same argument against a crypto-api
supporting crypto hardware has been used in the past to argue against
a Linux kernel TCP/IP hardware offload layer. The argument is
completely invalid once one considers the typically lower speed of an
embedded processor going into a crypto or network-edge device.
Even better, synthesizable SoC designs like IBM PPC4xx and reconfigurable
processors architectures have opened further the concept of an on-chip
crypto or tcp/ip offload macro cell which virtually eliminates PCI
speed/latency concerns for these assist engines. It should be no
surprise that embedded Linux is highly desired in these application
specific processors.
Regards,
-- Matt Porter porter@cox.net This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST