On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 21:30, Dave Jones wrote:
> > This won't apply cleanly without the irqstack patch, but the conflict is
> > easy to resolve. It requires the thread_info cleanup.
>
> I'm wondering about interaction between this patch and the
> already merged CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW ?
It replaces it and actually makes it useful since IRQ usage is now
bounded and defined relative to non IRQ usage. Without IRQ stacks you
don't have a hope in hell of catching overflows that depend on an irq
occuring at the right moment
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:20 EST