Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> writes:
> Something else I took a look at in the last few days was the ECC
> drivers. These are also zero impact, and could go in after the freeze
> (assuming the authors want them merged). They could do with a small
> amount of cleanup, but otherwise look ok.
Assuming they work. No offense to the guys who got the ball rolling, but
the architecture is lousy, and every driver I have messed with does not
work correctly, and I wind up reimplementing it before I can use it.
I actually like the idea of ECC drivers, and routinely make certain
there is a working ECC driver on the systems I ship. It is so much
very easier to catch memory errors with good ECC error reporting. But
unless I have slept soundly through a fundamental change, the
linux-ecc project currently does not ship quality drivers. The
infrastructure is bad, and the code is not quite correct.
If you want I can dig up the drivers I am currently using and send
them to you.
I even have a working memory scrub routine.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:52 EST