In article <20021030.184443.87162307.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:44:43 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
> > We told you several times how this USAGI patch is not currently in an
> > acceptable form and needs to be reimplemented via the routing code.
>
> Yes, but I think
> - integrate our code to your tree
> then
> - reimplement (re-design)
> is better way to go forward.
>
> Absolutely not, we do not put improperly architected code into the
> tree first then clean it up later.
That patch do NOT change current architecture so above is unfair.
It would be ok to say "we do not put code into the part of
improperly architected code in the tree then clean it up later."
-- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:51 EST