Re: post-halloween 0.2

• Next message: Matt Domsch: "[BK PATCH 2.5.44] EDD updates"
• Previous message: george anzinger: "[PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 9"
• In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:17:20AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > Can you also mention not using gcc 3.0.x (stack pointer handling bug)
>
> Any chance of putting this sort of thing as #error detection
> in the compile so it auto-breaks? I seem to recall that's done
> for some versions of GCC already ...

And what arch is that for? Adding a nice facility for per-arch (and
maybe global) compiler / binutils testing would be nice, if we're going
to go down that road..

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matt Domsch: "[BK PATCH 2.5.44] EDD updates"
• Previous message: george anzinger: "[PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 9"
• In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: post-halloween 0.2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:48 EST