Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

From: Dan Kegel (dkegel@ixiacom.com)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 18:03:18 EST


Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>Another existing event queue for readiness notification to
>>be delivered via is Ben's AIO completion notification queue,
>>but I haven't heard a definitive story about whether
>>epoll events could be delivered that way. (The discussion
>>seems to always veer into a discussion of asynchronous
>>poll, which is something else.)
>
> Yep Dan, Ben proposed that approach that we did not have the time to test.
> The way of returning events of sys_epoll is very efficent, like you can
> see in the scalability page ( pipetest ) that Hanna and her team setup :
>
> http://lse.sourceforge.net/epoll/index.html

I do like those results. If, however, the unified approach performs
as well, it might be good to go with it to reduce the number of
interfaces, as Martin suggested. (Though he was suggesting kqueue as
the preferred interface, not Ben's aio...)
- Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:40 EST