Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:15:23 EST

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and Posix mqueues as FS"
Previous message: Jochen Friedrich: "[PATCH] IPv6 on Token Ring"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:02:49PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:56:47PM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
>
> > needing only one syscall per poll while building a changelist in
> > userspace...
>
> Which is so smashingly succesful for iptables. I would very much doubt the
> utility of building tables in userspace and them blasting them across,
> especially as they will tend to be large when people bother to use epoll.

Never mind, I should have read what you wrote. Building changesets in
userspace may have some utility.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and Posix mqueues as FS"
Previous message: Jochen Friedrich: "[PATCH] IPv6 on Token Ring"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:39 EST