Peter Waechtler wrote:
>>For the locking stuff, the patch should probably depend on the sysv rcu
>>patch, it cleans up locking a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well, I am a victim of "information hiding" ;-)
>
>
That's not information hiding - there were 3 different locking
implementations: first one with a per-queue spinlock that didn't support
growing the number of queues at runtime, then one with a global rw lock
and a per-queue spinlock, and the simple, global spinlock version that's
part of 2.3.x-2.5.4x.
>msq_lock(id) does not lock a queue, it locks/unlocks the whole array.
>Forget my post about a deadlock in ipc_addid()
>
>
Which deadlock did you see? With the RCU ipc patch [part of 2.5.44-mm6],
msg_lock again locks the queue, not the whole array. Calls to
ipc_addid() with the msq spinlock aquired are not permitted.
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:39 EST