Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 12:36:45 EST


>> Schedbench 4:
>> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
>> 2.5.44-mm4 32.45 49.47 129.86 0.82
>> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-1 38.61 45.15 154.48 1.06
>> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-1 37.81 46.44 151.26 0.78
>> 2.5.44-mm4-focht-12 23.23 38.87 92.99 0.85
>> 2.5.44-mm4-hbaum-12 22.26 34.70 89.09 0.70
>> 2.5.44-mm4-f1-h2 21.39 35.97 85.57 0.81
>
> One more remarks:
> You seem to have made the numa_test shorter. That reduces it to beeing
> simply a check for the initial load balancing as the hackbench running in
> the background (and aimed to disturb the initial load balancing) might
> start too late. You will most probably not see the impact of node affinity
> with such short running tests. But we weren't talking about node affinity,
> yet...

I didn't modify what you sent me at all ... perhaps my machine is
just faster than yours?

/me ducks & runs ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:38 EST