> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:57:30 +0100 (BST)
>
> I would be much happier about adding it, if you could tell me that
> I can then remove the flush_page_to_ram(page) from shmem_nopage?
>
> No we still have to support platforms using flush_page_to_ram()
>
> I didn't get a chance to deprecate this in 2.5.x, I wish I had.
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: 21 Oct 2002 17:12:22 +0100
>
> Send me the diffs Im happy to give them a spin.
>
> Here goes. I contacted Anton and Paulus about flush_icache_page as
> that is on the hitlist next and ppc/ppc64 is the only well maintained
> port using that.
I like your patch, but what has changed? Are those platforms which
were using flush_page_to_ram() now committed to its elimination?
Or have they already replaced it (not seen in your patch)?
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:36 EST