Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Sun Oct 27 2002 - 23:09:00 EST

Next message: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "[patch] Fix file-corrupting bug, kernels 2.5.41 to 2.5.44"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Next in thread: Andrew Pimlott: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> A) the spurious rebuild is still a tiny fraction of a second.

It can trigger other rebuilds which can take much longer.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "[patch] Fix file-corrupting bug, kernels 2.5.41 to 2.5.44"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Next in thread: Andrew Pimlott: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:35 EST