Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 09:06:31 EST
- Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: The pain with the Net Drivers (ne*, xirc2ps_c, etc)"
- Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
- In reply to: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Next in thread: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Reply: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 07:53, freaky wrote:
> So that would be data on the MBR, or partition table? Perhaps win doesn't
> have probs because it can handle to partitions types properly. MSI told me
No its seperate. The hpt/promise raid "borrows" part of the disk and
hides it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: The pain with the Net Drivers (ne*, xirc2ps_c, etc)"
- Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
- In reply to: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Next in thread: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Reply: freaky: "Re: KT333, IO-APIC, Promise Fasttrak, Initrd"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:31 EST