On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Documentation/Changes claims modutils 2.4.2 is still acceptable. However
> it seems at least 2.4.10 is needed for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. What should
> Changes be changed to ?
Sounds reasonable.
Keith:
What's your opinion on the following patch for 2.4 (and a similar one for
2.5)?
--- linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes.old 2002-10-26 04:44:26.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes 2002-10-26 04:45:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version
o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v
o util-linux 2.10o # fdformat --version
-o modutils 2.4.2 # insmod -V
+o modutils 2.4.10 # insmod -V
o e2fsprogs 1.25 # tune2fs
o jfsutils 1.0.12 # fsck.jfs -V
o reiserfsprogs 3.6.3 # reiserfsck -V 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs
> regards
> john
cu
Adrian
--"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:30 EST