On Thursday 24 October 2002 19:25, Jim Houston wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> The Posix timers entry in your list is confused. I don't know how
> my patch got the name Google.
Sorry, misread "George's version" as "Google's version" at 5 am one morning.
Lot of late nights recently... :)
> I think Dan Kegel misunderstood George's answer to my previous
> announcement. George might be picking up some of my changes, but there
> will still be two patches for Linus to choose from. You included the URL to
> George's answer which quoted my patch, rather than the URL I sent you.
Had it in, then took it out. I'm trying to collate down the list wherever I
can.
> Here is the URL for an archived copy of my latest patch:
> Jim Houston's [PATCH] alternate Posix timer patch3
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103549000027416&w=2
It's back now.
> I would be happy to see either version go into 2.5.
So what exactly is the difference between them?
> The URLs for George's patches are incomplete. I believe this is the
> most recent (it's from Oct 18). The Sourceforge.net reference has the
> user space library and test programs, but I did not see 2.5 kernel
> patches.
>
> [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 3 (NOT HIGH RES)
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103489669622397&w=2
He's up to version 4 now.
> Thanks
> Jim Houston - Concurrent Computer Corp.
Rob
-- http://penguicon.sf.net - Terry Pratchett, Eric Raymond, Pete Abrams, Illiad, CmdrTaco, liquid nitrogen ice cream, and caffienated jello. Well why not? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:30 EST