Re: VM BUG, set_page_dirty() buggy?

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 04:52:45 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark"
Previous message: Joe Thornber: "Re: [Patch] Latest device-mapper snapshot"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "VM BUG, set_page_dirty() buggy?"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: VM BUG, set_page_dirty() buggy?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Oct 25 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I've attached oread in its simplicity. System being tested here is a
> dual P3-800MHz, not using preempt (never do). It doesn't matter if the
> input is on /dev/sda or ide disk, scsi cdrom, or atapi cdrom. It behaves
> the same way, data is lost.

Well here it is...

-- Jens Axboe

text/plain attachment: oread.c

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark"
Previous message: Joe Thornber: "Re: [Patch] Latest device-mapper snapshot"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "VM BUG, set_page_dirty() buggy?"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: VM BUG, set_page_dirty() buggy?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:27 EST