Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 18:35:17 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch"
Previous message: Peter Chubb: "Fix name of discarded section in modules.h"
In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20021024211633.A21583@in.ibm.com> you write:
> AFAICS, find_first_bit() needs to be fixed to return "size" if the
> bitmask is all zeros.

Yes, the x86 one looks wrong. Other archs seem to get this correct.

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch"
Previous message: Peter Chubb: "Fix name of discarded section in modules.h"
In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Reply: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:25 EST