On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 07:00:23PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
>
> I've not implemented it yet, but I'm pretty sure I can detect surprise
> extractions in my cPCI driver. The only thing holding me back at the
> moment is that there's no clear way to report this status change via
> pcihpfs without doing something a bit funky like reporting "-1" in the
> "adapter" node.
Why would you need to report anything other than if the card is present
or not? What would a "supprise" removal cause you to do differently?
Hm, well I guess we should be extra careful in trying to shut down any
driver bound to that card...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:25 EST