Re: [PATCH] NMI request/release, version 5 - I think this one's ready

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 15:29:10 EST

Next message: Ed Sweetman: "Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation"
Previous message: Mike Civil: "Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation"
In reply to: Corey Minyard: "Re: [PATCH] NMI request/release, version 5 - I think this one's ready"
Next in thread: Corey Minyard: "[PATCH] NMI request/release, version 6 - "Well I thought the last one was ready""
Reply: Corey Minyard: "[PATCH] NMI request/release, version 6 - "Well I thought the last one was ready""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:

> > if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(low)) {
> > ... found
> >
> Any way to do this for the IO_APIC case?

Ugh, forgot about that. I have no idea, sorry

regards
john

-- 
"This is playing, not work, therefore it's not a waste of time."
	- Zath
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ed Sweetman: "Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation"
Previous message: Mike Civil: "Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation"
In reply to: Corey Minyard: "Re: [PATCH] NMI request/release, version 5 - I think this one's ready"
Next in thread: Corey Minyard: "[PATCH] NMI request/release, version 6 - "Well I thought the last one was ready""
Reply: Corey Minyard: "[PATCH] NMI request/release, version 6 - "Well I thought the last one was ready""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:25 EST