Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?)

From: David S. Miller (davem@rth.ninka.net)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 05:46:53 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?)"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 03:14, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> I can't use sendfile(). I'm working with files > 4GB, and from man 2 sendfile:

That's what sendfile64() is for. In fact every vendor I am aware
of is shipping the sys_sendfile64() patch in their kernels and
an appropriately fixed up glibc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?)"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:23 EST